Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys

AccuSpam (support(_at_)accuspam(_dot_)com) wrote:

> 3. Thus if a receiver (be it the MTA or MUA) is verifying whether an email is
> a forgery, if the "-all" is not present in the SPF DNS record, then the
> question can not be answered with 100% certainty.
MUAs cannot be receivers of mail.  Only MTAs can receive mail.

-- 
Greg Wooledge                  |   "Truth belongs to everybody."
greg(_at_)wooledge(_dot_)org              |    - The Red Hot Chili Peppers
http://wooledge.org/~greg/     |

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
http://www.InboxEvent.com/?s=d --- Inbox Event Nov 17-19 in Atlanta features 
SPF and Sender ID.
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature