spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys

2004-08-23 11:12:00
In <20040823123313(_dot_)333032894D(_at_)apex(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com> "Andriy 
G. Tereshchenko" <spf-discuss(_at_)spam(_dot_)24(_dot_)odessa(_dot_)ua> writes:

Greg Wooledge wrote:
MUAs cannot be receivers of mail.  Only MTAs can receive mail.

Wrong. [...]

P.S> If your MUA can not receive mail - you will be unable to read
this message ;-)


Greg is right, MUAs cannot be receivers of mail, by the very
definition of what a MUA is.  You appear to be creating non-standard
definitions of terms like MUA and MTA.  See things like RFC2476 or
wikipedia for explanations of what the differences between MDAs, MTAs,
MSAs, and MUAs.

Note that a program can often contain more than one of these
components.  For example, most MTAs (sendmail, exim, etc.) also have
MDA functionality, and many MUAs also support MSA functionality.



-wayne



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>