I got this: The security certificate was issued by a company you have not
chosen to trust. Bla bla bla...
I would tent to not trust them.
You don't get this error when using verisign since they are trusted by
default.
Unfair practices?
Also, if certificates are free, spammers and hackers can get one just as
easy as me. So what good are they? Good for testing, sure.
Guy
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com] On Behalf Of John A.
Martin
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 3:34 PM
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: [spf-discuss] Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality
(actually two steps)
"Stuart" == Stuart D Gathman
"Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps)"
Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:17:07 -0400 (EDT)
Stuart> I could also see a non-profit issuing certificates for
Stuart> free.
http://www.cacert.org
jam
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
http://www.InboxEvent.com/?s=d --- Inbox Event Nov 17-19 in Atlanta features
SPF and Sender ID.
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com