Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF

AccuSpam wrote:

> To the degree Bayesian is correlating data in the headers, then the above 
> algorithm does not apply.  But I bet spammers could at least reduce Bayesian to 
> 80% effective (which is unacceptable).
>  
Yes, yes, more theory.  Over here in the real world, my Bayesian filters 
are working pretty well.
BTW, it doesn't surprise me that someone who is pitching a fee-based 
anti-spam system is interested in discrediting Bayesian filtering.