Re: Fw: Received your email: [Re: (spf-discuss)Opening Debate on SPF vs.

On Sun, 2004-08-22 at 06:10 +0800, AccuSpam wrote:
> (to refute for public record)
>
> Sorry to disappoint you Mark, but AccuSpam is working very, very well.
You said you were going to refute it, but then you only rebutted it. 

Remember, kids: autoresponders must reply _only_ to the SMTP
reverse-path, and must reply with an _empty_ SMTP reverse-path. 

All else is likely to get you reported to your upstream network provider
as an attempted denial of service attack.

-- 
dwmw2