On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 00:11, Koen Martens wrote:
It's just very unfortunate that this is all going on, but still things
are the way they are now. I don't have a solution, no-one will budge in
these matters i'm afraid. There is no central authority here, who can
decide for us. So we will all have to learn and live with it. Now maybe
this can be in the spf faq: 'What is the difference between libspf and
libspf2?' and this i a pure objective manner. So far we have:
- libspf has a smaller codebase
- libspf2 has it's own crypto code
SPF has nothing to do with cryptography.
I am not going to go into this discussion as its not going to benefit
anyone.
Cheers,
James.
--
James Couzens,
Programmer
( ( (
((__)) __lib__ __SPF__ '. ___ .'
(00) (o o) (0~0) ' (> <) '
---nn-(o__o)-nn---ooO--(_)--Ooo--ooO--(_)--Ooo---ooO--(_)--Ooo---
http://libspf.org -- ANSI C Sender Policy Framework library
http://libsrs.org -- ANSI C Sender Rewriting Scheme library
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PGP: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x7A7C7DCF
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Send us money! http://spf.pobox.com/donations.html
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part