Christian Brunschen wrote:
To my mind, there is an obvious solution.
*Both* the 'libspf' and 'libspf2' projects should be renamed, in such a
way that they use names that cannot be confused, and also such that
neither name will be inherently more official-looking or more generic
than the other.
I agree. This is what should have been done from the start.
Of course, this renaming effort would require a lot of work (that could be
better spent on other things) and also create a bit of confusion, so I'm
neither _for_ nor _against_ it at this point.
Michael R. Brumm