spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys

2004-08-20 16:20:09
At 02:29 PM 8/20/2004 -0700, you wrote:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 04:30:39AM +0800, AccuSpam wrote:

However, consider that supporting "-all" for SPF (in order to give SPF
similar anti-forgery power) for all domains is also going to require
upgrades to all MUAs in order to integrate with many different flavors
of SMTP authentication at many different servers.  At least with
SenderKeys, the integration for MUA is very well defined and very
simple and uses existing protocols.  The MUA simply POPs (or IMAP) the
SenderKeys auto-response, stores the private key and uses it.  STMP
and POP see SenderKeys as just another e-mail, no compatibility issues
as there will be with SPF:



I believe you have a fundamental misunderstanding of how SPF checks are
implemented.


Specifically what factually?  I am confident you are mistaken.  We can get to 
the bottom of your misunderstanding if you state fact instead of your 
unsubstantiated opinion.

Thanks,
Shelby