On Sat, 2004-07-31 at 23:20, wayne wrote:
Calm down James.
I'm perfectly calm, I thought my last post was exceptionally amusing.
(it should fail, but libspf passes it.)
Well look at the bright side Wayne, at least its saying "PASS". :-)
I have no idea how big the patch would need to be to fix libspf, but
it appears to be close to a complete rewrite of the ptr: mechanism.
Thats ok Wayne, as you mature as a programmer you'll find it easier to
make estimates as to the time required to fix things. ;)
Cheers,
James
--
James Couzens,
Programmer
( ( (
((__)) __lib__ __SPF__ '. ___ .'
(00) (o o) (0~0) ' (> <) '
---nn-(o__o)-nn---ooO--(_)--Ooo--ooO--(_)--Ooo---ooO--(_)--Ooo---
http://libspf.org -- ANSI C Sender Policy Framework library
http://libsrs.org -- ANSI C Sender Rewriting Scheme library
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PGP: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x7A7C7DCF
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Send us money! http://spf.pobox.com/donations.html
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part