spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Case Sensitivity

2004-08-01 02:00:31
On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 07:58:49PM -0700, James Couzens wrote:
As Roger Moser kindly pointed out, this is how both his Windows library,
and and libSPF handle domain names.  As previously mentioned
"libspf-alt" aka "libspf2"* is simply a young library, and is usually
the case its suffering from growing pains such as mistakes like this.

Come on james, this has got to stop _now_. It's not that long ago that
your libsrs had the same flaw in handling it's SRS hashes: contrary to
what the RFC's said your library handled the SRS hash as if case was
always preserved, the RFC clearly stated you should never assume that
this is the case. Did we shout 'oh what an immature library, folks don't
use this crap'? No, we pointed out the flaw and it got fixed. Done.

Please stop this. You are losing credibility with this behaviour. 

Koen

-- 
K.F.J. Martens, Sonologic, http://www.sonologic.nl/
Networking, embedded systems, unix expertise, artificial intelligence.
Public PGP key: http://www.metro.cx/pubkey-gmc.asc
Wondering about the funny attachment your mail program
can't read? Visit http://www.openpgp.org/

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Send us money!  http://spf.pobox.com/donations.html
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com

Attachment: pgpqEz6k0aHtb.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>