What is the defect in SPF then?
http://accuspam.com/senderkeys.php
Read the page please.
*fairly* sure is not good enough - too many false positives implied here.
Wrong. You are confused. Please re-read the page.
I pay my ISP to connect me - if their costs go up - so will mine
You pay for all the forgery you download also (twice actually), which would be
eliminated.
Which is just about everyone who has a private domain name - that's a tall
order for loads of people who are not tech savvy.
Wrong. They only have to download an upgrade for their existing email program.
Nothing technical at all.
SPF is much more technical hurdle for them because then they have to configure
SMTP AUTH (server and email program upgrade), DNS, and still forwarding is
broken
or complicated.
AccuSpamTM ...sending an auto-response email
Already mentioned on website and forums.
stand a good chance to get reported as spammers and have their accounts
cancelled or their servers blacklisted
Any one who is being forged has a good chance of being blacklisted by many
anti-spam.
That is one of big motivations for anti-forgery proposals.
SPF to see if the mail-from was forged before you
sent out your challenge and reply
Unfortunately SPF can not do that, unless "-all" is specified. If "-all" was
widely adopted, then you'd really have false positives all over the place.
SenderKeys provides a way to do "-all" where "-all" is not practical for most
domains.
Great, go fuck yourself then.. And don't bother us with your useless crap,
please..
No-one who believes in security uses IE, the sites I host
(some of which get 200.000+ hits a day) show a market share of
34%... Get your facts checked please..
Grow up a bit, realize there is more then just one OS, ... , more then just
one browser
http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/07/12/HNielosesshare_1.html
IE has 95% marketshare. That leaves 5% for Mozilla, old Netscape, Firefox, and
what ever else.
So maybe Mozilla plus old Netscape (which won't display CSS any way) is 3%.
The mature business person knows which browser butters his bread.
Do a Google search on 80/20 rule, which is a very important time management
skill.
Sorry, wish it wasn't true, but there really is a monopoly (in case you did not
notice).
Besides, i think their accuspamTM system is a copy of some systems already
out there
You are highly misinformed.
Unfactual posts do not help solve forgery and does not factually compare SPF
and SenderKeys.
The point of this discussion should be to factually compare the two proposals.
I am sure your motivation is to arrive at the optimum solution, whether it be
SPF, SenderKeys, DomainKeys, SenderID, or some combination or other proposal?
I'm not going to read anything from an autoresponder that's going to
make me take ANY steps to get my mail delivered
Off topic, but for the record, AccuSpam does not force the sender to do
anything so that recipient can receive the sender's email.
Thanks,
Shelby