On Sat, 21 Aug 2004, AccuSpam wrote:
Strengths of SPF and SenderKeys
=========================
I was hoping others here would go directly into substantively comparing which
scenarios SPF and SenderKeys are more viable than each other.
Since that has happened yet after > 25 posts in this thread I started, I will
try to nudge the discussion in that direction if possible.
Did you learn how to read at Microsoft? Several people, myself
included have posted questions and scenarios relating to the use of
SenderKeys, which you have conveniently glossed over, in order to debate
the merits of HTML 4.0 standard code, and whether IE should be used more
than Mozilla.
What I, and many others on this list, want to know is:
Who's going to patch:
Outlook
Outlook Express
Eudora
Mac Mail
Mutt
Pine
Elm
Lotus Notes
Remedy
my bank
your bank
the insurance companies
all the mainframe email systems
all the bbs systems
all the webmail systems.
brazil
india
china
korea
usa
europe
etc
etc
What are your proposals for dealing with embedded systems, and large
commercial installation that can't just "patch the MUA"?
I know you've been getting these emails, too, because I keep getting
your damn autoresponder. On the up side, at least you know the AccuSPAM
autoresponder will work. It's one thing you're good at.
-Tim
--
There are 10 types of people on Earth. Those who understand binary, and those
who don't.