spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re: Patent license

2004-08-24 07:53:52
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
| On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 09:11:37AM -0500,
|  wayne <wayne(_at_)midwestcs(_dot_)com> wrote
|  a message of 42 lines which said:
|
|
|>If you want your voice to be heard, I highly recommend
|>reading/reviewing a large portion of the archives.  You should also
|>be somewhat knowledgeable about the workings of the IETF.  There are
|>some good RFCs/FAQs on the IETF website.  The "tao of the IETF" (or
|>some name close to that) is a very good read.
|
|
| In that respect, the IETF is no different from any other
| organization. Imagine a guy who subscribes to spf-discuss and, five
| minutes later, start expressing vocal opinions about how SPF should
| be, while it is clear he never read spf.pobox.com or used a SPF
| implementation before...

Didn't someone just do that the end of last week? /me thinks someone did
but it's so hard to remember... ;-)

- --
Chuck Mead <csm(_at_)redhat(_dot_)com>
Instructor II (and resident Postfix bigot), GLS
Disclaimer: "It's Thursday and my name is Locutus of B0rk!"
Addendum: "Bwahahaha! Fire up the orbital mind-control lasers!"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBK1aAZfy0juH51WsRAlNLAKCTEeV+jurJ9IBsRraQEUzTaNfxRwCgmpLC
cRqEyYKjekXhUiRFiTWVgG4=
=obWS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>