Re: Re: Patent license

Chuck Mead said:

Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
|
| In that respect, the IETF is no different from any other
| organization. Imagine a guy who subscribes to spf-discuss and, five
| minutes later, start expressing vocal opinions about how SPF should
| be, while it is clear he never read spf.pobox.com or used a SPF
| implementation before...

Didn't someone just do that the end of last week? /me thinks someone did
but it's so hard to remember... ;-)


Heh...  I was thinking the same thing.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Patent license, (continued) Re: Patent license, william(at)elan.net Re: Patent license, jpinkerton Re: Patent license, Koen Martens Re: Patent license, Rodolfo Sikora Re: Patent license, william(at)elan.net Re: Patent license, Nico Kadel-Garcia Re: Patent license, Michel Bouissou Re: Patent license, wayne Re: Patent license, Stephane Bortzmeyer Re: Re: Patent license, Chuck Mead Re: Re: Patent license, rgreene(_at_)tclme(_dot_)org <= Re: Patent license, jpinkerton Re: Patent license, wayne RE: Patent license, Seth Goodman RE: Patent license, Stuart D. Gathman Re: Patent license, Waitman C Gobble II Re: Patent license, Waitman C Gobble II Re: Patent license, jpinkerton

Previous by Date:	Re: Sender ID and Return Path, Koen Martens
Next by Date:	Re: Sender ID and Return Path, Waitman C Gobble II
Previous by Thread:	Re: Re: Patent license, Chuck Mead
Next by Thread:	Re: Patent license, jpinkerton
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]