On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 08:37:53AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
Right. So we've imposed all this breakage, and still haven't got any
sane and actually deployable alternative to SRS for _fixing_ said
breakage -- and we've 'reduced' the problem to basically the same
problem as we had before. Only instead of listing IP addresses in our
'reputation database' we are now listing domain names.
Seems like the whole exercise was fairly pointless.
SPF protects my domains from being used by malicious persons / programs,
and therefore SPF is very useful for me. It will stop the flow of
bounces (already has done so as it appears, haven't received buckets
full of bounces for months now), it will stop the misuse of my domains
and the complaints that flow from it. So in one word: yay spf!
I also think there's nothing wrong with srs. Works perfectly.
Koen
--
K.F.J. Martens, Sonologic, http://www.sonologic.nl/
Networking, embedded systems, unix expertise, artificial intelligence.
Public PGP key: http://www.metro.cx/pubkey-gmc.asc
Wondering about the funny attachment your mail program
can't read? Visit http://www.openpgp.org/
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
http://www.InboxEvent.com/?s=d --- Inbox Event Nov 17-19 in Atlanta features
SPF and Sender ID.
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
pgpMFsSLqfDrb.pgp
Description: PGP signature