Re: Patent license


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Scott Kitterman" <spf(_at_)kitterman(_dot_)com>
To: <spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 8:35 AM
Subject: RE: [spf-discuss] Patent license

It seems to me that Microsoft's bad past behavior (or lack thereof) is a

bit

off topic.  For example, would anyone feel better if it were Oracle or

Sun?

I would. Sun can spell "open-source", and so can Oracle. Neither of them
have the history of intellectual property theft and abuse.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Patent license, (continued) Re: Patent license, jpinkerton Re: Patent license, AccuSpam Re: Patent license, Graham Murray Re: Patent license, AccuSpam Message not available Message not available Re[2]: Patent license, Chris Drake Re: Patent license, Holm, Mark Re: Patent license, Stuart D. Gathman RE: Patent license, Ryan Malayter RE: Patent license, terry RE: Patent license, Scott Kitterman Re: Patent license, Nico Kadel-Garcia <= RE: Patent license, Scott Kitterman Re: Patent license, Koen Martens Re: Patent license, Nico Kadel-Garcia

Previous by Date:	Re: Fw: Received your email, Mark
Next by Date:	A hyperdimensional anti-spam machine?, Holm, Mark
Previous by Thread:	RE: Patent license, Scott Kitterman
Next by Thread:	RE: Patent license, Scott Kitterman
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]