Oops! I want to apologize for misattributing this. Sloppy editing. It was
actually posted by guy, not Paul.
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 09:51:16 -0400, David Brodbeck wrote
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:00:49 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote
The typical Windows sysadmin needs a GUI to configure things.
If the sysadmin did not need a GUI, they would be using a real OS!
That's a little unfair. I manage a few Windows servers. It's not
because I particularly like Windows; it's because some of the
software we run requires it. That makes Windows the best tool for
the job, in those cases. I have Linux servers handling other tasks,
where it makes more sense.