spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Re: Interaction with anti-spam systems

2004-08-08 11:34:42
When I wrote in my previous message:

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com] On Behalf Of John 
Glube
Sent: August 8, 2004 2:05 PM
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Interaction with anti-spam systems

Seth Goodman wrote on August 8, 2004 at 5:02 AM

This law has yet to be passed, it appears to directly
contravene the intent of the Federal Legislation, and even
if it didn't, it will have to withstand lengthy and
aggressive court challenges by the DMA, the author of the
original legislation.  

<snip>

It should have read:

Seth Goodman wrote on August 8, 2004 at 5:02 AM

This law has yet to be passed, it appears to directly contravene
the intent of the Federal Legislation, and even if it didn't, it
will have to withstand lengthy and aggressive court challenges
by the DMA, the author of the original legislation. 

To clearly point out what was a quote. I regret any
inconvenience.

John
 
John Glube
Toronto, Canada
 
The FTC Calls For Sender Authentication
http://www.learnsteps4profit.com/dne.html

 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.734 / Virus Database: 488 - Release Date: 04/08/2004
 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>