spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Spam undetectable by SPF (domain reputation) or Bayesian (content)?

2004-08-29 09:44:05
On Sun, 2004-08-29 at 17:46, AccuSpam wrote:
Will the PRA enable me to say this is a forgery?

Because this spam will very likely get through most per-user Bayesian (unless 
names such as "Olusegun Obasanjo" are used on future spam runs), and there 
isn't a url in the e-mail to correlate.

You might be surprised at how often that name comes up in spam:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Olusegun+Obasanjo+net-abuse

Doing domain reputation of "sina.com" (or change it to "hotmail.com" 
hypothetically) could cause many false positives, and this would apply even 
if Return-Path == From.

The only ways I see to possibly catch a spam like this without causing false 
positives is to use a much higher degree of cross-correlation (I will not 
elaborate).

Regular Bayesian filters such as the one built in to mozilla-mail are
very good at detecting Nigerian 419 scams like this one. Please choose a
better example to illustrate your (valid) points.

Nigerian 419 scammers make extensive use of freemail accounts; most of
them aren't actually forgeries at all.

Paul.
-- 
Paul Howarth <paul(_at_)city-fan(_dot_)org>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: Spam undetectable by SPF (domain reputation) or Bayesian (content)?, Paul Howarth <=