Ah, we are thinking along the same lines her, maybe i should read entire
threads before replying ;)
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 02:39:54PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Perhaps you need to look at each level as a aggregate and then see if there
are sub-domains that are at significant variance. If the aggregate was
spammy, then a new sub-domain at that or a lower level would start out with
a somewhat negative reputation that would have to be overcome and if the
aggregate was hammy, it would start out somewhat positive.
Hmm, now we're getting deep into probability theory if we want to get
this right. There's still the danger one might punish innocent domains
by the bad reputation of the aggregate reputation..
Curious to see how this works out though, like to see some formula's..
Go through it numerically..
Koen
--
K.F.J. Martens, Sonologic, http://www.sonologic.nl/
Networking, embedded systems, unix expertise, artificial intelligence.
Public PGP key: http://www.metro.cx/pubkey-gmc.asc
Wondering about the funny attachment your mail program
can't read? Visit http://www.openpgp.org/