Don't publish IRC noise here. Please!
Make a new mailing list, or a web page to an IRC archive.
Guy
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com] On Behalf Of wayne
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 4:50 PM
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] #spf IRC channel
In <00bf01c4dbd6$dcdcf910$3d4b573e(_at_)idimo2> "jpinkerton"
<johnp(_at_)idimo(_dot_)com>
writes:
From: "wayne" <wayne(_at_)schlitt(_dot_)net>
I have been told that irc.pobox.com had a hardware failure last night,
and the pobox folks are working on it.
Last I heard, it is a disk control problem and will be fixed "tomorrow
morning".
again, the other systems are: london.irc.perl.org grou.ch irc.darkuncle.net
Could it be arranged for the spf irc channel to be repeated to this list
in
a similar way to the council one? Some of us aren't on there much/at all
and it would be nice to catch up on threads that may have an impact on our
thoughts ;-)
Well, I was thinking about that when I was setting up the #spf-council
logs. However, the signal to noise ratio is much lower on #spf. IRC
is, after all, the "Internet Relay Chat" and there tends to be a fair
amount of chitchat and joking around.
If people really want it, I can easily do it, but I'm concerned about
lowering the already low S/N ratio on SPF-discuss.
-wayne
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Read the whitepaper! http://spf.pobox.com/whitepaper.pdf
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com