spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Re[2]: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement

2004-12-07 08:28:22
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com]On Behalf Of Chris 
Drake
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 7:42 AM
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: Re[2]: [spf-discuss] Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement


equally, and it's *really* important to *not* point out their faults.
Oh yeah? - like - forget the fact that SPF et al all suffer from
100 to 1000 *times* more false positives than the current leading anti
spam and anti-forgery techniques ...

I'm curious what your data for this is?

Scott Kitterman