-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
william(at)elan.net wrote:
| On Thu, 23 Dec 2004, Guy wrote:
|
|
|>Oops, I just saw the reference to SPF in the title, but not in the
details.
|>"SPF Enabled Enterprise Class Anti-Spam Network Appliance"
|>But I still don't see any reference to Sender ID.
|
|
| You guys did not get it - the reason they advertised it as "Sender ID"
| is because Meng and others are now saying that SPF is part of SID and
| that if they support SPF they can also say that they support SID.
|
| And SPF Council after several weeks still has not (re)acted to make the
| distinction clear
Read yesterday's irc logs... it's happening now...
- --
Chuck Mead <csm(_at_)redhat(_dot_)com>
Instructor II (and resident Postfix bigot), GLS
Disclaimer: "It's Thursday and my name is Locutus of B0rk!"
Addendum: "Bwahahaha! Fire up the orbital mind-control lasers!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFByx0OZfy0juH51WsRAhouAJ9k8ctzMxWzVGAqUBIzhIn/9pPaBQCfRzHl
8X/dtip/4Gf8j543rmJ96Y0=
=omEd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----