william(at)elan.net wrote:
16:15 <Julian> 1614u: seconded.
16:15 <csm-laptop> votes?
16:15 <grumpy> 1614u yes
16:15 <MarkK> 1641u: yes
16:15 <Julian> 1614u: abstain
16:15 <csm-laptop> so ordered
I only see two votes above - Julian abstained (btw I think its the first
time it happened that council cound not reach decision with all who voted
being in favor), Meng was not present and Chuck did not vote being a
chair. So I'm not certain it can really be considered a work task
approved by the council with only two votes in favor.
Quorum to hole a meeting is 4.
I motioned (an automatic vote "for" is presumed)
Julian abstained.
3 out of 4 is a majority.
So... the council has proposed an official positional draft be created
and it will be reviewed on the 29th.
I believe it is appropriate for the statement to be reviewed by SPF-discuss
and council should then make decision to support or modify or reject based
on views presented. This is what would make a difference having this as as
statement from SPF Council or being general one coming from SPF Community.
Well we shall see what happens on the 29th. Your opinion is important
and has been noted! :-)
--
csm(_at_)moongroup(_dot_)com, head geek
http://moongroup.com