As far as devices being used to stop spam, in the next year or so you
can kiss them good bye, increase in spam attacks and virus writers
working spammers. These devices will not be able to process the email,
let alone detect them as spam.
Clustered infrastructure is the way to go. and probably outsourcing
is the only real solution. This is for companies with large email
profiles (more then 1 user) :)
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 15:43:43 -0500, Chuck Mead <csm(_at_)moongroup(_dot_)com>
wrote:
william(at)elan.net wrote:
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004, Chuck Mead wrote:
Quorum to hole a meeting is 4.
I motioned (an automatic vote "for" is presumed)
Why is this an automatic vote "for"?
I've pariticipated in organizations and in most a motion is completely
different then voting for or against, in fact I've seen number of cases
where whoever brought the motion (often a chair) abstained.
If that were the case in this instance I would have openly said so.
Now, I'd let it be this time since just now you made it clear that you
would have voted for it. But for the future I'd like to see that no
vote be considered "automatic" - this is why they call it voting :)
I guess I was there and you weren't? ;-)
--
csm(_at_)moongroup(_dot_)com, head geek
http://moongroup.com
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Read the whitepaper! http://spf.pobox.com/whitepaper.pdf
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com