-----Original Message-----
From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com]On Behalf Of Alex
van den
Bogaerdt
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 3:22 AM
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] Handling of -all
I stand by my original comment: It is, IMHO, too soon to actually
start blocking based on what could very well be a simple mistake.
cheers,
alex
And that's your receiver policy. You are welcome to it, but that's not what
I intended when I wrote my sender policy.
The beauty of the whole system is that if you reject during the SMTP
session, undesireable rejections will get reported back to the actual
originator of the message and things can get fixed. That's how progress
gets made. I don't have a strong preference for rejection or delivery. The
one thing I would strongly object to is bouncing post-SMTP.
Scott K