Scott Kitterman wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com]On Behalf Of David
Woodhouse
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 2:24 PM
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] Could SPF prevent delivery of Non-SPAM eMail?
On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 13:57 -0500, Martin G. Diehl wrote:
other anti-forgery techniques.
I'm interested in that.
Would you please enumerate them for me?
http://david.woodhou.se/why-not-spf.html has a brief summary with links
which you can follow for more information.
The problem for those of us who are domain owners, but not mail server
operators is that none of the alternatives are ready for us today.
Amen
And further all of the alternatives have their own issues (false
positives for whatever reason, e.g. forwarders changing headers
invalidating the signature, etc)
Terry
Scott Kitterman
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Read the whitepaper! http://spf.pobox.com/whitepaper.pdf
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
--
Terry Fielder
terry(_at_)greatgulfhomes(_dot_)com
Associate Director Software Development and Deployment
Great Gulf Homes / Ashton Woods Homes
(416) 441-9085
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Read the whitepaper! http://spf.pobox.com/whitepaper.pdf
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com