spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Email Forwarder's Protocol ( EFP )

2005-02-22 23:17:13

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com 
[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com] On Behalf Of Craig 
Whitmore
Sent: woensdag 23 februari 2005 6:55
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: RE: [spf-discuss] Email Forwarder's Protocol ( EFP )

No, Received-SPF has very different information than the 
Received header. The only duplicated element is connection IP.


Yes quite different.. this is the type of Received-SPF header 
I get using the SPF Socketmap: (testing today)

(Accept from message header)

Received-SPF: pass (dbmail-mx4.orcon.co.nz: domain of
      XXXX(_at_)bounces(_dot_)spamcop(_dot_)net designates 64.74.133.248 as
      permitted sender)
      receiver=dbmail-mx4.orcon.co.nz;
      client-ip=64.74.133.248;
      envelope-from=<XXXX(_at_)bounces(_dot_)spamcop(_dot_)net>;
      helo=vmx1.spamcop.net;

Glad you're using it. :) This, btw, is the 'new' Received-SPF header
format, as defined in draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.

A rejection from the sendmail logs:

Feb 23 18:45:58 dbmail-mx4 sm-mta[3731]: j1N5joV5003731: 
ruleset=check_mail,
arg1=<dcknip(_at_)subscribe(_dot_)ru>, 
relay=na-148-243-225-194.na.avantel.net.mx
[148.243.225.194] (may be forged), reject=550 5.7.1 
<dcknip(_at_)subscribe(_dot_)ru>...
Please see
http://spf.pobox.com/why(_dot_)html?sender=dcknip(_at_)subscribe(_dot_)ru&ip=14
8.243.225.194&
receiver=dbmail-mx4.orcon.co.nz

Yeah, one is the spf_header_comment, the other the spf_smtp_comment. They
serve different purposes, of course.

The socketmap has lasted (not crashed) a lot longer than the 
milter type stuff.

Good. :) And now that Sendmail::Milter is out of the loop, I doubt you
will ever see it crash. I have been running SRS-socketmapd (based on more
or less the same programming frame) for over two months now; and it has
never crashed so far, either.

I really appreciate you testing the waters; and I would really like to
hear back from people like you, in case SPF-socketmapd behaves
unexpectedly (which is doubtful too, but still).

- Mark 
 
        System Administrator Asarian-host.org
 
---
"If you were supposed to understand it,
we wouldn't call it code." - FedEx