spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Email Forwarder's Protocol ( EFP )

2005-02-26 07:19:34
Mark, Please start a new thread for this discussion. The archives are getting impossible to follow. -- Dave

At 01:56 PM 2/26/2005 +0000, Mark wrote:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
> [mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com] On Behalf Of 
Lennon - Orcon
> Sent: zaterdag 26 februari 2005 12:18
> To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
> Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] Email Forwarder's Protocol ( EFP )
>
> Another problem (little)
>
> Getting a few of these type of thing..
>
> Feb 26 13:46:55 dbmail-mx4 sm-mta[16402]: j1Q0kopx016402:
> ruleset=check_mail, arg1=<rochelleandpeter(_at_)xtra(_dot_)co(_dot_)nz>,
> relay=[210.54.64.175], reject=451 4.7.1 Please see
> 
http://spf.pobox.com/why(_dot_)html?sender=rochelleandpeter(_at_)xtra(_dot_)co(_dot_)
> nz&ip=210.54.64.175&receiver=dbmail-mx4.orcon.co.nz:DNS
> error while looking up 175.64.54.210.in-addr.arpa PTR:SERVFAIL
>
> It is possible to make SPF not do this checking and allow
> sendmail do it?

As per the specs, rejecting is up to the MTA:

2.5.6  TempError