spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Email Forwarder's Protocol ( EFP )

2005-02-25 18:12:49
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 05:49:31PM -0700, David MacQuigg wrote:

We can then use the Received: headers for the bounce path instead of 
bouncing directly to the forged Return-Path:.  If the mail is legit, 
sending it back along the bounce path will get it to the same place as the 
Return-Path.  If its a forgery, the bounces will stop where they should, at 
the forger's domain, and not bother anyone at the forged Return-Path.

So to make SPF work with forwarders, we don't need any new headers, just a 
few more words in an existing, widely accepted header, and an agreement on 
how forwarders should handle bounces.

Am I missing something?

Yes, again.

You cannot assume you can connect to a host that connected to you.
And no, not being able to connect back is no indication of forgery.

Alex