Julian Mehnle wrote:
De jure, there isn't such a thing as SPF v2 yet. Neither de
facto, there is just a handful of wanna-be Sender-ID records
that use "v=spf2.0" syntax.
Come on, Jim Lyon has the same right to publish drafts (with
coauthor Meng), as Mark Lentczner, Wayne Schlitt, and others
like Phil. The Katz & Lyon spf2.0 drafts exist, they're not
yet expired. William's spf2.0/submit is also still tabled.
But the IESG discussed only Katz & Lyon & Schlitt, because
that's what Ted Hardie promised after the MARID collapse -
the change from Mark to Wayne as author caused no problem.
If there really is such a misunderstanding, we need to
eliminiate it.
Seconded. BTW, Ted Hardie is AFAIK on vacation at the moment,
I vaguely recall a vacation mail on a W3C mailing list. Bye.