Mark Kramer wrote:
I would like to add, though, that I might be persuaded to have the
sentence say:
"Checking other identities against SPF records is undocumented."
Scott Kitterman wrote:
How about, "Outside the scope of the SPF design".
This is all splitting hairs. They're essentially all the same as
"undefined", which IMO is unacceptable in a specification that deals with
"v=spf1".
Why are we seeking a compromise? What's the point? (Serious question!)
Do we just want to please the IETF or somebody else? Or is there real
technical merit to weaken the current wording?