In <42A48174(_dot_)33EE(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de> Frank Ellermann
<nobody(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de> writes:
wayne wrote:
* In section 1.1. "State of this draft", the note about the
draft not being for the IESG review was removed. This
draft *is* for the IESG review.
Fine, and using their crystal ball they will clearly see that
you now want a review as a "proposed standard" with a proper
"last call", or how is that supposed to work ?
My understanding is that I need to request standard track to the
rfc-editor and the IESG and I will do so in the email that will go
with the submission of the I-D.
-wayne