spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re: Validator Testing Request

2005-08-09 08:27:09
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, wayne wrote:

that strikes me as strange.

Not really, if you have "v=spf1 a a a a a" it's five mechanisms
- we cannot expect implementations to "think" about such crap.

I think Richard's point is that those redundant "a" mechanisms don't
do anything useful, while "ptr:foo.com ptr:bar.com ptr:baz.com" does
do something useful.  More over, you can't shorten up those ptr:
checks. 

Exactly.  There is only ever on PTR record looked up on an SPF query.  It would
be entirely reasonable to make PTR count only once - regardless of
how many mechanisms refer to it.  Once it is fetched (and the A
records fetched), then all further references are computational
overhead only.

However, PTR does require also looking up at least one A record.
So it ought to count for 2 the first time, and all subsequent uses
are free.

I could make a case for mx mechanisms counting as 2, but I won't.

-- 
              Stuart D. Gathman <stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com>
    Business Management Systems Inc.  Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flamis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.