Mark Berry wrote:
If I'm not getting the wrong end of the stick, the proposal is to
publish spf info for ISP's who do not do so themselves?
Ummm, I think it will be opening a real can of worms if your 'proxy'
record causes any third party who has not explicitly requested you do
this on their behalf, loose some mail due to it.
The proxy is really intended to satisfy includes which would otherwise break a valid
record. All the operators within the proxy are given as ?ip4: and the include from the
users record itself will be ?include: so there will be no "fail" because of the proxy, and
there will be a lot of "pass" results which would otherwise not happen.
I've got several ISP's on the request list now
cox.net
comcast.net
rogers.com
vianet.ca
sympatico.ca
blackberry.net
Anyone got any more?
Slainte
JohnP