spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Draft IETF appeal

2005-08-23 08:34:45
In <20050822232646(_dot_)GA22558(_at_)primefactor(_dot_)com> Mark Shewmaker 
<mark(_at_)primefactor(_dot_)com> writes:

    That is, the spf1 spec could consider, if there were no spf1 record
    for a domain, that there be a default assumed spf record of: "v=spf1
    mx -all", meaning that compliant receivers would drop all mail that
    didn't come from the incoming mail servers from non-spf-publishing
    domains.

Meng, and others, have widely recommend using a default SPF record of
"v=spf1 a/24 mx/24 ptr ?all".  I haven't heard too many objections to
it.  (I don't directly support it in libspf2, but it could still be
done with libspf2.)


-wayne


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>