spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Draft IETF appeal

2005-08-22 23:57:03


Julian Mehnle wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Wayne Schlitt wrote:

William Leibzon wrote:

Now I note that since Wayne said that SPF Council made a resolution to
go with appealing the decision it is COUNCIL'S responsibility to
follow up on this resolution (and QUICKLY!). That means you either
decide who of the SPF Council members would be making an appeal next
week or you deligate to to somebody else, but you can't just leave it
up in the air as time to will run out very very soon.

The SPF council resolution said that *someone* should prepare an
appeal, not *a council member*.


True.  The resolution says:

| Someone should prepare an appeal to the IETF in case we cannot get MS to
| stop re-using v=spf1 records for PRA checking. The appeal shall be
| submitted to the IETF if there are no clear indications that MS is
| willing to open serious discussions about this within 7 days [as of
| 2005-07-19]. Julian will prepare the appeal it if nobody else will.


Julian said he would do it, but Julian has also explained to me on IRC
that he has been very busying doing work that he gets paid for right
now.  Unless something changes, I think you should probably not expect
him to have the time to file the appeal.


Not exactly true. Yes, I am busy, but I also said that I would prepare the appeal if nobody else would. It seems that nobody else has prepared one, so I went ahead and did it, making use of Frank's write-up (thanks!).


William is right about running out of time.  To be quite honest, I
thought time had already run out.


The IESG announced the publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 as an Experimental RFC on 2005-06-29[1]. That sets the appeal deadline for Monday, 2005-08-29.

I have attached my draft for the appeal.  Please comment on it.


<big snip>
Well written Julian - send it. All the lesser points can be brought up in 
discussions.

Slainte
JohnP


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>