spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Any actions coming in regards to approval of SID drafts for RFC and their IETF "approved" reuse of v=spf1 records ?

2005-08-23 00:03:49


Julian Mehnle wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Seth Goodman wrote:

Frank Ellermann wrote:

<http://openspf.com/esps.html>

[...]
BTW, what the dickens is a page describing the operation of Sender-ID as
a recommended way for large companies to send bulk mail doing on
openspf.com? Could somebody please take this page down?  Our site should
not be promoting SID in any way, shape or form.


I agree that we should not be promoting S-ID. However, the page could still be valuable in modified form. A first step would be to s/Sender ID/SPF/, and perhaps we should reword the page so that the recommendation for setting the "right" headers comes over more as a general advice, not so much as a prerequisite for SPF compliance. (Having sensible headers is always a good thing.)

Comments?

I think we should only mention SenderID as one of many other options, and include the method by which it can be avoided. See http://spfhelp.net/other_protocols.html

Slainte,
JohnP


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>