Julian Mehnle wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Seth Goodman wrote:
Frank Ellermann wrote:
<http://openspf.com/esps.html>
[...]
BTW, what the dickens is a page describing the operation of Sender-ID as
a recommended way for large companies to send bulk mail doing on
openspf.com? Could somebody please take this page down? Our site should
not be promoting SID in any way, shape or form.
I agree that we should not be promoting S-ID. However, the page could
still be valuable in modified form. A first step would be to
s/Sender ID/SPF/, and perhaps we should reword the page so that the
recommendation for setting the "right" headers comes over more as a
general advice, not so much as a prerequisite for SPF compliance. (Having
sensible headers is always a good thing.)
Comments?
I think we should only mention SenderID as one of many other options, and include the
method by which it can be avoided. See http://spfhelp.net/other_protocols.html
Slainte,
JohnP