Well, finally, some one who gets most of it right.
Only question I have is, because I am some what new here, are we
privately peeved about MS's PR attempts?
Who believes MS's account of what they (MS) claim is true? I haven't
trusted what they say about anything since Windows 3.1. I just get the
occasional pleasant surprise.
-------------------------------------
Mike Kelly
Systems Tech
Broadview Software Inc.
416-778-0623 x239
mkelly(_at_)broadviewsoftware(_dot_)com
-----Original Message-----
From: wayne [mailto:wayne(_at_)schlitt(_dot_)net]
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 18:05
To: SPF discussions
Subject: [spf-discuss] News article: Could Microsoft Lose IETF Backing
for Sender ID?
fyi;
http://www.computerwire.com/industries/research/?pid=63EFC750%2DB0D5%2D4
B12%2D8489%2D4E332C1015A1
I haven't read it yet, so I can't make any comments on it.
-wayne
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com