Scott Kitterman wrote:
<huge snip>
Reputation inevitably inolves heuristics. If you want to jump from
anti-forgery to anti-spam, I think it's probably necessary.
I would like to find ways to do less heuristics and more deterministic
things.
I believe we should stick to anti-forgery. Any-spam is a minefield, given different
peoples/organistions/governments ideas on whether a specific e-mail is spam or ham.
Anti-forgery will kill off a huge percentage of spam anyway, and there will be little for
the heuristic methods to work on - possibly giving rise to an increase in false positives
there because of the lack of a statisically meaningful number of mails to work on.
Slainte,
JohnP.
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com