-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
gaven(_at_)gavdogg(_dot_)net wrote:
So if I understand this correctly, domains which receive their email
through some sort of front runner, like an ETRN service, want to be able
to do SPF checks? The problem would then be that the front runner would
be delivering messages which would fail SPF because the front runner is
not the originating domain's outbound server?
You don't do SPF checks when receiving mail by ETRN.
More generally, you should always know your "front runners" -- regardless
whether they are ETRN services or classic forwarding services -- and
exempt ("white-list") them from SPF checking. Either you trust your
forwarders not to forward you any crap (then don't do SPF checks), or you
don't (then why would you use their services?).
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDH4vWwL7PKlBZWjsRAmLpAKDXomrHLx+X5lf+PusdT81503tASQCdGFut
WNiKJR4ZZpAROPAEyAH1m1M=
=J7Xj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com