Yeah... shouldn't the DSN only be sent on a SPF pass?
I hate bloody backscatter!! Anyone have any good filtering rules for sorting
the good DSN from bad?
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Finch [mailto:dot(_at_)dotat(_dot_)at]
Sent: 19 October 2005 11:39
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] SPF enables fully automatic spam filter
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
4) Incoming mail that is not whitelisted or fails to get an SPF
pass (and
is not otherwise rejected by e.g. SPF fail) gets quarantined if it looks
like spam. A DSN is sent to the alleged sender first. If the
DSN is not
accepted, the message still trains DSpam as spam, but is
discarded instead
of quarantined.
Yay for backscatter!
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <dot(_at_)dotat(_dot_)at> http://dotat.at/
BISCAY: WEST 5 OR 6 BECOMING VARIABLE 3 OR 4. SHOWERS AT FIRST.
MODERATE OR
GOOD.
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate
your subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)co
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com