Julian Mehnle wrote:
DKIM should not be using the SPF RR type if the RR type is
called "SPF".
SPF and SSP both have "sender" and "policy", and both would
be TXT-clones. The SSP part is short enough to fit within a
general "framework" set of records with the same RR type.
I *strongly* feel that the namespace scheme ("_spf.<domain>"
vs. "_policy._domainkey.<domain>" vs. just "<domain>")
schould be standardized across all protocols that make use
of such a common RR type.
If the FQDN is different you lose the one and only advantage
of a shared RR type: Only one "real" DNS query for those
who need both.
For "real query" read "answer not already cached". Bye, Frank
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com