spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spf-discuss] Re: GMAIL mis-usage of SPF?

2005-11-17 21:09:04
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, Hector Santos wrote:

If its going to stay in this API or others, at the very least, make it
consistent with the specs using:

    Received-SPF: NONE (XXXX)

I understand.  In my case, no other software will be interpreting 
the Receive-SPF header, so the 3rd party software issue is moot.  However, in
case of wider use, I should follow your advice.  I *do* want to see the guessed
result in the headers.  Perhaps another header?  How about:

Received-SPF: NONE (XXXX)
X-Guessed-SPF: PASS (XXXX)

That should be clear to both man and machine.

-- 
              Stuart D. Gathman <stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com>
    Business Management Systems Inc.  Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flamis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>