----- Original Message -----
From: "Stuart D. Gathman" <stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com>
I understand. In my case, no other software will be interpreting
the Receive-SPF header, so the 3rd party software issue is moot.
However, in case of wider use, I should follow your advice. I *do*
want to see the guessed result in the headers. Perhaps another
header? How about:
Received-SPF: NONE (XXXX)
X-Guessed-SPF: PASS (XXXX)
That should be clear to both man and machine.
I like this proposal Stuart. I think NONE (xxxx) might be sufficient, but
the extra header could be better if you think it would be. :-)
--
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com