On 11/29/2005 07:41, Julian Mehnle wrote:
Scott Kitterman wrote:
Arjen de Korte wrote:
In my opinion the CallerID code is obsolete, so this could be removed
from the code.
Stuart and I removed the equivalent code from pySPF over the summer for
that reason.
Hmm, and did you get any complaints about the removed "feature"?
I guess the real question is, what would removing C-ID support from the
next (and probably last, forever) release of M:S:Q _gain_ us, or anyone
else for that matter?
No. Since I don't know of any more C-ID records, there doesn't seem to be
much to break.
In my view obsolete cruft should be excised. OTOH, if we are in fact at the
end of M:S:Q, then it's not such a big deal. How close is the new reference
to being done?
Scott K
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com