spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?

2005-11-30 07:52:29
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005, Julian Mehnle wrote:

system might perform.  Only if the receiver system accepts the DATA 
command and the message data with a 2xx status code, should the 
forwarding/relaying/proxying system "accept" the message vis-a-vis the 
calling system.  (Or of course if the receiver system isn't reachable.)

As a backup MX, you might consider accepting the message only when the reciever
system *isn't* reachable, rejecting the rcpt envelope with 4xx when it *is*
reachable.  Normal senders should use the primary MX when available.
Only spammers will try a backup MX first, hoping for weaker spam
defenses.

-- 
              Stuart D. Gathman <stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com>
    Business Management Systems Inc.  Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flamis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>