spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?

2005-11-29 04:54:06
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

David Woodhouse wrote:
[...] the single rule should be 'just don't generate bounce messages'.

You should never, during normal operation, accept a mail by SMTP unless
you're actually going to deliver it.

Do _all_ your checking, whether it includes SPF or not, before giving a
successful response to the end of the DATA. If you don't want the mail,
then just say so. Don't accept it and then find yourself stuck with the
task of bouncing it.

Very good advice indeed.

Actually even forwarders/relays should try to deliver a message to the 
remote MTA in real time before accepting it themselves (sort of a 
semi-proxy mode).  Only if the remote MTA cannot be reached should the 
message be accepted and stored for later delivery.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDjEE1wL7PKlBZWjsRAkWgAJ9+KeNG+KOjDwg1uWX2FqvZL2nrKACfS20b
MaqTUvxNzBMC8DmnM4b4dLU=
=+iLz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>