Julian Mehnle wrote:
suggested yourself
Sorry if that was unclear, but what I really [1] wanted to say
was that I'd be glad if Nick or John do it. For me "CIVS" is
still experimental [2]. I've no idea what the effect is if I'd
pick 1-1-3-3-5 or 1-1-2-2-3 or 1-1-x-x-5 (x = no opinion) in
the case of five candidates when I like the 1st and the 2nd and
hate the 5th candidate. ROs are supposed to know the rules. ;-)
Bye, Frank
1: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.spf.discuss/20041
2: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.spf.discuss/20043
OT, finally I get the feeling for this Wiki stuff. Was it
there where you picked up your "footnote style" ?
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com