wayne wrote:
The fact that they call the lentczner-spf draft the
"original" SPF shows just how clueless about SPF they are.
They probably took the "spf-considerations" draft as input,
the title was draft-newton-maawg-spf-considerations. With
the decent charme of a Linux-article written by SCO <sigh />
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com